Joann Sfar continues to charm the nation while promoting his new book with Pantheon: THE RABBI'S CAT. He was on National Public Radio yesterday, for a terrific interview. He even played country music live. You can hear it for yourself on NPR's website: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4805753 trade show banner link P.S. I am not related to NPR's Robert Siegel, as far as I know.

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, microsoft internet explorer browser economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more disney world honeymoon packages than their bra size; that they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial school fundraising events circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that life insurance sales leads they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right monopoly board game rules to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation medical assistant training programs and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

inspire business intelligence software

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating natural gas generator that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

stainless ip whois

stainless identity management system

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either trade show banner stands inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

Joann Sfar continues to charm the nation while promoting his new book with Pantheon: THE RABBI'S CAT. He was on National Public Radio yesterday, for a terrific interview. He even played country music live. You can hear it for yourself on NPR's website: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4805753 link P.S. I am not related to NPR's Robert Siegel, as far as I know. internet explorer browser

Joann Sfar continues to charm the nation while promoting disney world honeymoon his new book with Pantheon: THE RABBI'S CAT. He was on National Public Radio yesterday, for a terrific interview. He even played country music live. You can hear it for yourself on NPR's website: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4805753 link P.S. I am not related to NPR's Robert Siegel, as far as I know.

stainless fundraising events

Joann Sfar continues to charm the nation while promoting his new book with Pantheon: THE RABBI'S CAT. He was on National Public Radio yesterday, for a terrific interview. He even played country music live. You can hear it for yourself on NPR's website: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4805753 insurance sales leads link P.S. I am not related to NPR's Robert Siegel, as far as I know.

Julie has a problem I'm sure a lot of you can relate to! My 15-month-old son will squeal at such a pitch as to cause terrible pain in our eardrums. He will squeal when he is frustrated, not getting his own way, having to sit in one spot too long (eg. Out for dinner, or in the stroller shopping)…normal toddler issues. What can we do to stop this? Should we ignore it and cause the general public to also deal with ear pain? Or is it time to start some discipline with timeouts? This is a tremendously common toddler behaviour, monopoly board game particuarly at this age, when language is generally so limited. It is a way to express their feelings, and it's generally hugely effective at getting what they want. For the toddler, it's a win-win. Not so much for the parents and any innocent bystanders! What to do? First, whenever possible, avoid the squealing by dealing with the situation before it gets to that point . (I'm quite sure you already do this, but I can't skip it and have everyone assuming I don't do this first, too!) Take the tot from the high chair as soon as he's done; leave the mall when he gets restless. Bring toys to distract and snacks to keep the blood sugar stable. If squealing starts, speaking simply and firmly, identify the problem, and give the child a positive option . "Suzie! Too loud. You want down? Use your quiet voice. Quiet voice." When you say "quiet voice", say it quietly. Model a quiet voice.

One of the most troubling cultural developments of recent times is the rise of what has been dubbed "torture porn", films that dwell lingeringly on the physical details of tortured innocents. I have not seen any of these- the Saw and Hostel films, or The Captive, the most recent addition to the genre, but I have read written accounts of them and they are hideous. Much of what passes for entertainment these days is appalling, an appeal to the basest impulses and darkest corners of the fallen psyche. The films have done well at the box office, often outgrossing--in both senses of the word--their competitors. I suppose that we ought to be grateful, at least, that the torturers in these films are the bad guys, not the heroes, as in the hit television series 24-- which I also have not seen--where the good guy, Jack Bauer, regularly tortures terrorists. All for a good cause, of course. What should trouble us further is the fact that all of this is taking place against a background of U.S. government-sanctioned torture. Whatever sidestepping and evasiveness marked the Bush administration's response to accusations of torture in the past, it has become undeniable that America has joined the ranks of the torturers. Waterboarding, exposure to extreme temperatures, denial of food and water, sleep deprivation, attack dogs, aural assault: it reads like medical assistant programs a catalog of tactics from some second rate dictatorship.

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has business intelligence software an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

One of the most troubling cultural developments of recent times is the rise of what has been dubbed "torture porn", films that dwell lingeringly on the physical details of tortured innocents. I have not seen any of these- the Saw and Hostel films, or The Captive, the most recent addition to the genre, but I have read written accounts of them and they are hideous. Much of what passes for entertainment these days is appalling, an appeal to the basest impulses and darkest corners of the fallen psyche. The films have done well at the box office, often outgrossing--in both senses of the word--their competitors. coleman powermate generator I suppose that we ought to be grateful, at least, that the torturers in these films are the bad guys, not the heroes, as in the hit television series 24-- which I also have not seen--where the good guy, Jack Bauer, regularly tortures terrorists. All for a good cause, of course. What should trouble us further is the fact that all of this is taking place against a background of U.S. government-sanctioned torture. Whatever sidestepping and evasiveness marked the Bush administration's response to accusations of torture in the past, it has become undeniable that America has joined the ranks of the torturers. Waterboarding, exposure to extreme temperatures, denial of food and water, sleep deprivation, attack dogs, aural assault: it reads like a catalog of tactics from some second rate dictatorship.

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that ip whois they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should identity management system be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

stainless trade show banner

stainless internet explorer browser

Joann Sfar continues to charm the nation disney world honeymoon while promoting his new book with Pantheon: THE RABBI'S CAT. He was on National Public Radio yesterday, for a terrific interview. He even played country music live. You can hear it for yourself on NPR's website: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4805753 link P.S. I am not related to NPR's Robert Siegel, as far as I know.

Click Here

Joann Sfar continues to charm the nation while promoting his new book with Pantheon: THE RABBI'S CAT. He was on National Public Radio yesterday, for a terrific interview. He even played country music live. You can hear it insurance sales leads for yourself on NPR's website: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4805753 link P.S. I am not related to NPR's Robert Siegel, as far as I know.

One of the most troubling cultural developments of recent times is the rise of what has been dubbed "torture porn", films that dwell lingeringly on the physical details of tortured innocents. I have not seen any of these- the Saw and Hostel films, or The Captive, the most recent addition to the genre, but I have read written accounts of them and they are hideous. Much of what passes for entertainment these days is appalling, an appeal to the basest impulses and darkest corners of the fallen psyche. The films have done well at the box office, often outgrossing--in both senses of the word--their competitors. I suppose that we ought to be grateful, at least, that the torturers in these films are the bad guys, not the heroes, as in the hit television series 24-- which I also have not seen--where the good guy, Jack Bauer, regularly tortures terrorists. All for a good cause, of course. What should trouble us further is the fact that all of this is taking place against a background of U.S. government-sanctioned torture. Whatever sidestepping and evasiveness monopoly board game marked the Bush administration's response to accusations of torture in the past, it has become undeniable that America has joined the ranks of the torturers. Waterboarding, exposure to extreme temperatures, denial of food and water, sleep deprivation, attack dogs, aural assault: it reads like a catalog of tactics from some second rate dictatorship.

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing medical assistant programs they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

One of the most troubling cultural developments of recent times is the rise of what has been dubbed "torture porn", films that dwell lingeringly on the physical details of tortured innocents. I have not seen any of these- the Saw and Hostel films, or The Captive, the most recent addition to the genre, but I have read written accounts of them and they are hideous. Much of what passes for entertainment these days is appalling, an appeal to the basest impulses and darkest corners of the fallen psyche. The films have done well at the box office, often outgrossing--in both senses of the word--their competitors. I suppose that we ought to be grateful, at least, that the torturers in these films are the bad guys, not the heroes, as in the hit television series 24-- which I also have not seen--where the good guy, Jack Bauer, regularly tortures terrorists. All for a good cause, of course. What should trouble us further is the fact that all of this business intelligence software is taking place against a background of U.S. government-sanctioned torture. Whatever sidestepping and evasiveness marked the Bush administration's response to accusations of torture in the past, it has become undeniable that America has joined the ranks of the torturers. Waterboarding, exposure to extreme temperatures, denial of food and water, sleep deprivation, attack dogs, aural assault: it reads like a catalog of tactics from some second rate dictatorship.

stainless diesel generator manufacturer

One of the most troubling cultural developments of recent times is the rise of what has been dubbed "torture porn", films that dwell lingeringly on the physical details of tortured innocents. I have not seen any of these- the Saw and Hostel films, or The Captive, the most recent addition to the genre, but I have read written accounts of them and they are hideous. Much of what passes for entertainment these days is appalling, an appeal to the basest impulses and darkest corners of the fallen psyche. The films have done well at the box office, often outgrossing--in both senses of the word--their competitors. I suppose that we ought to be grateful, at least, that the torturers in these films are the bad guys, not the heroes, as in the hit television series 24-- which I also have not seen--where the good guy, Jack Bauer, regularly tortures terrorists. All for a good cause, of course. What should trouble us further is the fact that all of this is taking place against a background of U.S. government-sanctioned torture. Whatever sidestepping and evasiveness marked the Bush administration's response to accusations of torture in the past, it has become ip address whois undeniable that America has joined the ranks of the torturers. Waterboarding, exposure to extreme temperatures, denial of food and water, sleep deprivation, attack dogs, aural assault: it reads like a catalog of tactics from some second rate dictatorship.

Julie has a problem I'm sure a lot of you can relate to! My 15-month-old son will squeal at such a pitch as to cause terrible pain in our eardrums. He will squeal when he is frustrated, not getting his own way, having to sit in one spot too long (eg. Out for dinner, or in the stroller shopping)…normal toddler issues. What identity management system can we do to stop this? Should we ignore it and cause the general public to also deal with ear pain? Or is it time to start some discipline with timeouts? This is a tremendously common toddler behaviour, particuarly at this age, when language is generally so limited. It is a way to express their feelings, and it's generally hugely effective at getting what they want. For the toddler, it's a win-win. Not so much for the parents and any innocent bystanders! What to do? First, whenever possible, avoid the squealing by dealing with the situation before it gets to that point . (I'm quite sure you already do this, but I can't skip it and have everyone assuming I don't do this first, too!) Take the tot from the high chair as soon as he's done; leave the mall when he gets restless. Bring toys to distract and snacks to keep the blood sugar stable. If squealing starts, speaking simply and firmly, identify the problem, and give the child a positive option . "Suzie! Too loud. You want down? Use your quiet voice. Quiet voice." When you say "quiet voice", say it quietly. Model a quiet voice.

Joann Sfar continues to charm the nation while promoting trade show banner his new book with Pantheon: THE RABBI'S CAT. He was on National Public Radio yesterday, for a terrific interview. He even played country music live. You can hear it for yourself on NPR's website: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4805753 link P.S. I am not related to NPR's Robert Siegel, as far as I know.

One of the most troubling cultural developments of recent times is the rise of what has been dubbed "torture porn", films that dwell lingeringly on the physical details of tortured innocents. I have not seen any of these- the Saw and Hostel films, or The Captive, the most recent addition to the genre, but I have read written accounts of them and they are hideous. Much of what passes for entertainment these days is appalling, an appeal to the basest impulses and darkest corners of the fallen psyche. The films have done well at the box office, often outgrossing--in both senses of the word--their competitors. I suppose that we ought to be grateful, at least, that the torturers in these films are the bad guys, not the heroes, as in the hit television series 24-- which I also have not seen--where the good guy, Jack Bauer, regularly tortures terrorists. All for a good cause, of course. What should trouble us further is the fact that all of this is taking place against a background of U.S. government-sanctioned torture. Whatever sidestepping and evasiveness marked the Bush administration's internet explorer browser update response to accusations of torture in the past, it has become undeniable that America has joined the ranks of the torturers. Waterboarding, exposure to extreme temperatures, denial of food and water, sleep deprivation, attack dogs, aural assault: it reads like a catalog of tactics from some second rate dictatorship.

Julie has a problem I'm sure a lot of you can relate to! My 15-month-old son will squeal at such a pitch as to disney world honeymoon cause terrible pain in our eardrums. He will squeal when he is frustrated, not getting his own way, having to sit in one spot too long (eg. Out for dinner, or in the stroller shopping)…normal toddler issues. What can we do to stop this? Should we ignore it and cause the general public to also deal with ear pain? Or is it time to start some discipline with timeouts? This is a tremendously common toddler behaviour, particuarly at this age, when language is generally so limited. It is a way to express their feelings, and it's generally hugely effective at getting what they want. For the toddler, it's a win-win. Not so much for the parents and any innocent bystanders! What to do? First, whenever possible, avoid the squealing by dealing with the situation before it gets to that point . (I'm quite sure you already do this, but I can't skip it and have everyone assuming I don't do this first, too!) Take the tot from the high chair as soon as he's done; leave the mall when he gets restless. Bring toys to distract and snacks to keep the blood sugar stable. If squealing starts, speaking simply and firmly, identify the problem, and give the child a positive option . "Suzie! Too loud. You want down? Use your quiet voice. Quiet voice." When you say "quiet voice", say it quietly. Model a quiet voice.

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that they fundraising events can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

stainless insurance sales leads

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that monopoly board game women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

One of the most troubling cultural developments of recent times is the rise of what has been dubbed "torture porn", films that dwell lingeringly on the physical details of tortured innocents. I have not seen any of these- the Saw and Hostel films, or The Captive, the most recent addition to the genre, but I have read written accounts of them and they are hideous. Much of what passes for entertainment these days is appalling, an appeal to the basest impulses and darkest corners of the fallen psyche. The films have done well at the box office, often outgrossing--in both senses of the word--their competitors. I suppose that we ought to be grateful, at least, that the torturers in these films are the bad guys, not the heroes, as in the hit television series 24-- which I also have not seen--where the good guy, Jack Bauer, regularly tortures terrorists. All for a good cause, of course. What should trouble us further is the fact that all of this is taking place against a background of U.S. government-sanctioned torture. Whatever sidestepping and evasiveness marked the Bush certified medical assistant programs administration's response to accusations of torture in the past, it has become undeniable that America has joined the ranks of the torturers. Waterboarding, exposure to extreme temperatures, denial of food and water, sleep deprivation, attack dogs, aural assault: it reads like a catalog of tactics from some second rate dictatorship.

Click Here

One of the most troubling cultural developments of recent times is the rise of what has been dubbed "torture porn", films that dwell lingeringly on the physical details of tortured innocents. I have not seen any of these- the Saw and Hostel films, or The Captive, the most recent addition to the genre, but I have read written accounts of them and they are hideous. Much of what passes for entertainment these days is appalling, an appeal to the basest impulses and darkest corners of the fallen psyche. The films have done well at the box office, often outgrossing--in both senses of the word--their competitors. I suppose that we ought to be grateful, at least, that the torturers in these films are the bad guys, not the heroes, as in the hit television series 24-- which I also have not seen--where the good guy, Jack Bauer, regularly tortures terrorists. All for a good cause, of course. What should trouble us further is the fact that all of this is taking place against a background of U.S. government-sanctioned torture. Whatever sidestepping and evasiveness marked the Bush administration's response to accusations of torture in the past, diesel generator manufacturer it has become undeniable that America has joined the ranks of the torturers. Waterboarding, exposure to extreme temperatures, denial of food and water, sleep deprivation, attack dogs, aural assault: it reads like a catalog of tactics from some second rate dictatorship.

Julie has a problem I'm sure a lot of you can relate to! My 15-month-old son will squeal at such a pitch as to cause terrible pain in our eardrums. He will squeal when he is frustrated, not getting his own way, having to sit in one spot too long (eg. Out for dinner, or in the stroller shopping)…normal toddler issues. What can we do to stop this? Should we ignore it and cause the general public to also deal with ear pain? Or is it time to start some discipline with timeouts? This is a tremendously common toddler behaviour, particuarly at this age, when language is generally so limited. It is a way to express their feelings, and it's generally hugely effective at getting what they want. For the toddler, it's a win-win. Not so much for the parents and any innocent bystanders! What to do? First, whenever possible, avoid the squealing by dealing with the situation before it gets to that point . (I'm quite sure you already do this, but I can't skip it and have everyone assuming I don't do this first, too!) Take the tot from the high chair as soon as he's done; leave the mall when he gets restless. Bring toys to distract and snacks to keep the blood sugar stable. If squealing starts, speaking simply and firmly, identify the problem, and give the child a positive option . "Suzie! Too loud. You want down? Use your quiet voice. Quiet voice." When you say "quiet voice", ip whois say it quietly. Model a quiet voice.

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as identity management systems men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

inspire trade show banner

Julie has a problem I'm sure a lot of you can relate to! My 15-month-old son will squeal at such a pitch as to cause terrible pain in our eardrums. He will squeal when he is frustrated, not getting his own way, having to sit in one spot too long (eg. Out for dinner, or in the stroller shopping)…normal toddler issues. internet explorer browser What can we do to stop this? Should we ignore it and cause the general public to also deal with ear pain? Or is it time to start some discipline with timeouts? This is a tremendously common toddler behaviour, particuarly at this age, when language is generally so limited. It is a way to express their feelings, and it's generally hugely effective at getting what they want. For the toddler, it's a win-win. Not so much for the parents and any innocent bystanders! What to do? First, whenever possible, avoid the squealing by dealing with the situation before it gets to that point . (I'm quite sure you already do this, but I can't skip it and have everyone assuming I don't do this first, too!) Take the tot from the high chair as soon as he's done; leave the mall when he gets restless. Bring toys to distract and snacks to keep the blood sugar stable. If squealing starts, speaking simply and firmly, identify the problem, and give the child a positive option . "Suzie! Too loud. You want down? Use your quiet voice. Quiet voice." When you say "quiet voice", say it quietly. Model a quiet voice.

One of the most troubling cultural developments of recent times is the rise of what has been dubbed "torture porn", films that dwell lingeringly on the physical details of tortured innocents. I have not seen any of these- the Saw and Hostel films, or The Captive, the most recent addition to the genre, but I have read written accounts of them and they are hideous. Much of what passes for entertainment disney world honeymoon package these days is appalling, an appeal to the basest impulses and darkest corners of the fallen psyche. The films have done well at the box office, often outgrossing--in both senses of the word--their competitors. I suppose that we ought to be grateful, at least, that the torturers in these films are the bad guys, not the heroes, as in the hit television series 24-- which I also have not seen--where the good guy, Jack Bauer, regularly tortures terrorists. All for a good cause, of course. What should trouble us further is the fact that all of this is taking place against a background of U.S. government-sanctioned torture. Whatever sidestepping and evasiveness marked the Bush administration's response to accusations of torture in the past, it has become undeniable that America has joined the ranks of the torturers. Waterboarding, exposure to extreme temperatures, denial of food and water, sleep deprivation, attack dogs, aural assault: it reads like a catalog of tactics from some second rate dictatorship.

Joann Sfar continues to charm the nation while promoting his new book with Pantheon: THE RABBI'S CAT. He was on National Public Radio yesterday, for a terrific interview. He even played country music live. You can hear it for yourself on NPR's website: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4805753 fundraising events link P.S. I am not related to NPR's Robert Siegel, as far as I know.

i'm a feminist. there. i said it. i'm proud to believe that women have as much intrinsic worth as men; that there is nothing they should be barred from doing because of their gender - either inside, or outside, ecclesial circles. i believe that women can be very sexy, but that they are not sex objects, placed here for the exploitation and enjoyment of men. i believe that women have a valuable contribution to make in society: politically, economically, spiritually, manually - just as men do. i believe that women should be measured by more than their bra size; that they can grow more beautiful with age; that their beauty (or value) does not necessarily depend on their physical looks (as society chooses to rate them). i believe that motherhood is sacred, precious and honorable in and of itself and that a woman has an intrinsic right to choose it as her life's work. insurance sales leads i believe that she likewise has the intrinsic right to choose other paths in life. i am not commenting at all here on the whole "pro-choice/pro-life" debate, but am simply stating that a woman is no more a de facto parent than any man. doesn't seem like very radical stuff to me. seems pretty axiomatic, in fact.

inspire monopoly board game

Joann Sfar continues to charm the nation while promoting his new book with Pantheon: THE RABBI'S CAT. He was on National Public Radio yesterday, for a terrific interview. He even played country music live. You can hear it for yourself on NPR's website: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4805753 medical assistant programs link P.S. I am not related to NPR's Robert Siegel, as far as I know.

Joann Sfar continues to charm the nation while promoting his new book with Pantheon: THE RABBI'S CAT. He was on National Public Radio yesterday, for a terrific interview. He even played country music live. You can hear it for yourself on NPR's website: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4805753 link P.S. I am not related to NPR's Robert Siegel, as business intelligence software far as I know.

inspire diesel generator manufacturer

Click Here

inspire identity management system

Reader mail has been on fire today. Perhaps it is a consequence of the new draconian white list policy I was forced to institute. Perhaps not. Whatever the cause, I am basking in reader mail goodness. Most recently, loyal reader "JN" points me to the blog of an alleged associate at Elevation Partners. (One more example in the rather full quiver of reasons I post anonymously). The free web browser peek into his world is a fascinating tour of rudderless and inept piloting through the narrow straits of the pacific ocean with all the pointless intoxication you'd expect from a sailor. But then, what did we expect from a blog named in part for a popular, foreign vodka? This, I suspect: "Myspace's best use has got to be for checking how drunk you were the night before." Or perhaps, this: Tales of Fattiness This weekend was a complete disaster. Friday night I was partying with some friends at Vessel and we ended up getting bottle service, which is never a good idea for me. I remember eating at Yuet Lee afterwards but not much else beyond that point. The next day when I was hanging out with some of the same people, one of them mentioned how a friend might have left their camera at the pho place.

Click Here

We had a great discussion the other night at the Emergent Cohort I attended. It is rare that a scholar the likes of Dr. Iain Torrance is in attendance at an event that also includes me, whose greatest claim to fame is being listed as a one of the Ten Emerging Church Bloggers . Hope he didn't feel like he was slummin' it. The discussion was around the issue of pastor as theologian. Tony Jones framed the question well by creating an ethical situation similar to that which he had created in this post , which brings the issue of present theology to the fore. After several of us weighed in with various thoughts, Dr. Torrance brought up the excellent question of the danger of seeking the contemporary. Movie Packs He used Athanasius and the Arian controversy to illustrate his point. Two admissions before moving on. One, I am not a trained theologian or academic. Antonio Gramsci talks about organic intellectuals. I am at best an organic blogger, and sometimes more ripe than others. While I might accept the notion of organic, throwing in the word intellectual skews the conversation and doesn't address the wired world in which I have found a voice. The folks at the Princeton cohort quote Volf and Moltmann. In my natural world I am more likely to quote Locke (Christopher, not John) and Lessig . Second, any theological knowledge I do have comes from my personal reading, which has been heavily influenced by missiological texts, including The Gospel in a Pluralist Society and Transforming Mission .

Note: this is a very long post, a meditation in draft form. I've revised it a little bit since medical pda programs I first posted it. I was sitting quietly the other day, reflecting on things to do with our faith, conversations I’ve had in recent days, as a Catholic, with Evangelical/Emergent Christians, thinking about the nature of authority in the Catholic Church and how different it is from authority in the Protestant world, when suddenly I heard a word, spoken very clearly in my mind: Acquiescence. Since coming into the Catholic world, I’ve read and thought a lot about the quality, or virtue, of obedience, and about its necessity as a virtue to develop if one hopes to grow in holiness: obedience to the Church on matters of the faith, trusting that the Church has been endowed by God with the charism of infallible interpretation of Scripture and all matters of the faith, through the office of the Pope and the Magisterium in union with the Pope. I have also been aware, both in the Protestant world and in the Catholic world, of much bickering about matters of the faith. At times, I’ve done my share of bickering, perhaps more than I should. As a Catholic, I’ve done my share of struggling with certain of the doctrines hard to understand, or challenging to really accept and live. I’ve struggled with aspects of church life in the Catholic world that are frustrating, or less than fulfilling.

jitter rebate programs

Reader mail has been on fire today. Perhaps it is a best uk savings rates consequence of the new draconian white list policy I was forced to institute. Perhaps not. Whatever the cause, I am basking in reader mail goodness. Most recently, loyal reader "JN" points me to the blog of an alleged associate at Elevation Partners. (One more example in the rather full quiver of reasons I post anonymously). The peek into his world is a fascinating tour of rudderless and inept piloting through the narrow straits of the pacific ocean with all the pointless intoxication you'd expect from a sailor. But then, what did we expect from a blog named in part for a popular, foreign vodka? This, I suspect: "Myspace's best use has got to be for checking how drunk you were the night before." Or perhaps, this: Tales of Fattiness This weekend was a complete disaster. Friday night I was partying with some friends at Vessel and we ended up getting bottle service, which is never a good idea for me. I remember eating at Yuet Lee afterwards but not much else beyond that point. The next day when I was hanging out with some of the same people, one of them mentioned how a friend might have left their camera at the pho place.

We had a great discussion the other night at the Emergent Cohort I attended. It is rare that a scholar the likes of Dr. Iain Torrance is in attendance at an event that also includes me, whose greatest claim to fame is being listed as a one of the Ten Emerging Church Bloggers . Hope he didn't feel like he was slummin' it. The discussion was around the issue of pastor as theologian. Tony Jones framed the question well by creating an ethical situation similar to that which he had created in this post , which brings the issue of present theology to the fore. After several of us weighed in with various thoughts, Dr. Torrance brought up the excellent question of the linux shared hosting danger of seeking the contemporary. He used Athanasius and the Arian controversy to illustrate his point. Two admissions before moving on. One, I am not a trained theologian or academic. Antonio Gramsci talks about organic intellectuals. I am at best an organic blogger, and sometimes more ripe than others. While I might accept the notion of organic, throwing in the word intellectual skews the conversation and doesn't address the wired world in which I have found a voice. The folks at the Princeton cohort quote Volf and Moltmann. In my natural world I am more likely to quote Locke (Christopher, not John) and Lessig . Second, any theological knowledge I do have comes from my personal reading, which has been heavily influenced by missiological texts, including The Gospel in a Pluralist Society and Transforming Mission .

We had a great discussion the other night at the Emergent Cohort I attended. It is rare that a scholar the likes of Dr. Iain Torrance is in attendance at an event that also includes me, whose greatest claim to fame is being listed as a one of the Ten Emerging Church Bloggers . Hope he didn't feel like he was slummin' it. The discussion was around the issue of pastor as theologian. Tony Jones framed the question well by creating an ethical situation high speed video camera similar to that which he had created in this post , which brings the issue of present theology to the fore. After several of us weighed in with various thoughts, Dr. Torrance brought up the excellent question of the danger of seeking the contemporary. He used Athanasius and the Arian controversy to illustrate his point. Two admissions before moving on. One, I am not a trained theologian or academic. Antonio Gramsci talks about organic intellectuals. I am at best an organic blogger, and sometimes more ripe than others. While I might accept the notion of organic, throwing in the word intellectual skews the conversation and doesn't address the wired world in which I have found a voice. The folks at the Princeton cohort quote Volf and Moltmann. In my natural world I am more likely to quote Locke (Christopher, not John) and Lessig . Second, any theological knowledge I do have comes from my personal reading, which has been heavily influenced by missiological texts, including The Gospel in a Pluralist Society and Transforming Mission .

jitter free spyware blocker

We had a great discussion the other night at the Emergent Cohort I attended. It is rare that a scholar the likes of Dr. Iain Torrance is in attendance at an event that also includes me, whose greatest claim to fame is being listed as a one of the Ten Emerging Church Bloggers thank you candy . Hope he didn't feel like he was slummin' it. The discussion was around the issue of pastor as theologian. Tony Jones framed the question well by creating an ethical situation similar to that which he had created in this post , which brings the issue of present theology to the fore. After several of us weighed in with various thoughts, Dr. Torrance brought up the excellent question of the danger of seeking the contemporary. He used Athanasius and the Arian controversy to illustrate his point. Two admissions before moving on. One, I am not a trained theologian or academic. Antonio Gramsci talks about organic intellectuals. I am at best an organic blogger, and sometimes more ripe than others. While I might accept the notion of organic, throwing in the word intellectual skews the conversation and doesn't address the wired world in which I have found a voice. The folks at the Princeton cohort quote Volf and Moltmann. In my natural world I am more likely to quote Locke (Christopher, not John) and Lessig . Second, any theological knowledge I do have comes from my personal reading, which has been heavily influenced by missiological texts, including The Gospel in a Pluralist Society and Transforming Mission .

jitter washington mutual

Click Here

We had a great discussion the other night at the Emergent Cohort I attended. It is rare that a scholar the likes of Dr. Iain Torrance is in attendance at an event that also includes me, hustler whose greatest claim to fame is being listed as a one of the Ten Emerging Church Bloggers . Hope he didn't feel like he was slummin' it. The discussion was around the issue of pastor as theologian. Tony Jones framed the question well by creating an ethical situation similar to that which he had created in this post , which brings the issue of present theology to the fore. After several of us weighed in with various thoughts, Dr. Torrance brought up the excellent question of the danger of seeking the contemporary. He used Athanasius and the Arian controversy to illustrate his point. Two admissions before moving on. One, I am not a trained theologian or academic. Antonio Gramsci talks about organic intellectuals. I am at best an organic blogger, and sometimes more ripe than others. While I might accept the notion of organic, throwing in the word intellectual skews the conversation and doesn't address the wired world in which I have found a voice. The folks at the Princeton cohort quote Volf and Moltmann. In my natural world I am more likely to quote Locke (Christopher, not John) and Lessig . Second, any theological knowledge I do have comes from my personal reading, which has been heavily influenced by missiological texts, including The Gospel in a Pluralist Society and Transforming Mission .

Available from eBay here . This is no ordinary N50 Pentel Pen Marker, this pen was 'liberated' by myself during a failed attempt to gain a place on Wieden and Kennedy's WKside scheme. This pen appears to have soaked up the creative energy flowing around the Wieden and Kennedy studio and, believe it or not, has the power to create award winning ad campaigns entirely on its own. I'm not entirely sure how it works, it may be something they put in the ink. I am, however, sure Wieden free web browser and Kennedy would like to keep the secret of their successes away from competitors almost as much as rivals would like to get their grubby mits on this little creative Holy Grail. Therefore I am confident of making a pretty penny one way or another and it looks like my interview wasn't entirely fruitless. Happy bidding Elliott

We had a great discussion the other night at the Emergent Cohort I attended. It is rare that a scholar the likes of Dr. Iain Torrance is in attendance at an event that also includes me, whose greatest claim to fame is being listed as a one of the Ten Emerging Church Bloggers . Hope he didn't feel like he was slummin' it. The discussion was around the issue of pastor as theologian. Tony Jones framed the question well by creating an ethical situation similar to that which he had created in this post , which brings the issue of present theology to the fore. After several of us weighed in with various thoughts, Dr. Torrance brought up the excellent question of the danger of seeking the contemporary. He used Athanasius and the Arian controversy to illustrate his point. Two admissions before moving on. One, I am not a trained theologian or academic. Antonio Gramsci talks about organic intellectuals. I am at best an organic blogger, and sometimes more ripe than others. While I might accept the notion of organic, throwing in the word intellectual skews the conversation and doesn't address the wired world in which I have found a voice. The folks at the Princeton cohort quote Volf and Moltmann. In my natural world I am more likely to quote Locke (Christopher, zuma deluxe not John) and Lessig . Second, any theological knowledge I do have comes from my personal reading, which has been heavily influenced by missiological texts, including The Gospel in a Pluralist Society and Transforming Mission .

jitter movie package

Reader mail has been on fire today. Perhaps it is a consequence of the new draconian white list policy I was forced to institute. Perhaps not. Whatever the cause, I am basking in reader mail goodness. Most recently, loyal reader "JN" points me to the blog of an alleged associate at Elevation Partners. (One more example in the rather full quiver of reasons I post anonymously). The peek into his world is a fascinating tour of rudderless and inept piloting through the narrow straits of the pacific ocean with all the pointless intoxication you'd expect from a sailor. But then, what did we expect from a blog named in part for a popular, foreign vodka? This, I suspect: "Myspace's best use has got to be for checking how drunk you were the night before." Or perhaps, this: Tales of Fattiness This weekend was a complete disaster. Friday night I was partying with some friends at Vessel and medical pda programs we ended up getting bottle service, which is never a good idea for me. I remember eating at Yuet Lee afterwards but not much else beyond that point. The next day when I was hanging out with some of the same people, one of them mentioned how a friend might have left their camera at the pho place.

Note: this is a very long post, a meditation in draft form. I've revised it a little bit since I first posted it. I was sitting quietly the other day, reflecting on things to do with our faith, conversations I’ve had in recent days, as a Catholic, with Evangelical/Emergent Christians, thinking about the nature of authority in the Catholic Church and how different it is from authority in the Protestant world, when suddenly I heard a word, spoken very clearly in my mind: Acquiescence. Since coming into the Catholic world, I’ve read and thought a lot about the quality, or virtue, of obedience, and about its necessity as a virtue to develop if one hopes to grow in holiness: obedience to the Church on matters of the faith, trusting that the Church has been endowed by God with the charism of infallible interpretation of Scripture and all matters of the faith, through the office of the Pope and the Magisterium in union with the Pope. rebate software I have also been aware, both in the Protestant world and in the Catholic world, of much bickering about matters of the faith. At times, I’ve done my share of bickering, perhaps more than I should. As a Catholic, I’ve done my share of struggling with certain of the doctrines hard to understand, or challenging to really accept and live. I’ve struggled with aspects of church life in the Catholic world that are frustrating, or less than fulfilling.

jitter best uk savings rates

Available from eBay here . This is no ordinary N50 Pentel Pen Marker, this pen was 'liberated' by myself during a failed attempt to gain a place on Wieden and Kennedy's WKside scheme. This pen appears to have soaked up the creative energy flowing around the Wieden and Kennedy studio and, believe it or not, has the power to create award winning ad campaigns entirely on its own. I'm not entirely sure how it works, it may be something they put in the ink. I am, however, sure Wieden and Kennedy would like to keep the secret of their successes away from competitors almost as much as rivals would like to get their grubby mits on this little creative Holy search engine optimization orange county Grail. Therefore I am confident of making a pretty penny one way or another and it looks like my interview wasn't entirely fruitless. Happy bidding Elliott

Click Here

Robert X. Cringely writes: ... WiMax, like most wireless networking technologies, is either-or. You can either have lots of bandwidth or you can have long range. There are exceptions to this rule if you have line-of-sight transmission and can use a matched set of high-gain antennas. Then, sure, WiMax can send those 70+ megabits per second for 30 miles and more -- sometimes a LOT more. But the way most of us envision using WiMax is with lower gain antennas, often without line of sight, and possibly even while moving from place to place, so the trade-off of bandwidth for distance is pretty severe. Most WiMax users will find that they can't get the target 70 megabits per second at 30 miles. They'll be lucky to get even one megabit per second at 30 miles. Possibly a LOT less, as WiMax's adaptive modulation slows transmission and throws on lots of forward error correction to make sure the signal gets through, however sluggishly. ... Link: PBS.org . Thanks to Stephen Hill for the tip. I live on top of an Idaho mountain ridge and just opened up a pseudo-WiMAX Clearwire account (discussed in the article) to replace the frustrating 802.11 based WISP that I've been using for five years. The only other broadband option for me is satellite. The original WISP might have a bit of an edge inbound high speed video camera (when it works at all), but the Clearwire account (which breaks more frequently but is easy to fix) has it all over the WISP outbound. --Dennis

Reader mail has been on fire today. Perhaps it is a consequence of the new draconian white list policy I was forced to institute. Perhaps not. Whatever the cause, I am basking in reader mail goodness. Most recently, loyal reader "JN" points me to the blog of an alleged associate at Elevation Partners. (One more example in the rather full quiver of reasons I post anonymously). The peek into his world is a fascinating tour of rudderless and inept piloting through the narrow straits of the pacific ocean with all the pointless intoxication you'd expect from a sailor. But then, what did we expect from a blog named in part for a popular, foreign vodka? This, I suspect: "Myspace's best use has got to be for checking how drunk you were the night before." Or perhaps, this: Tales of Fattiness This weekend was a complete disaster. Friday night I was partying with some friends at Vessel and we ended up getting bottle service, which is never a good idea for me. I remember eating at Yuet Lee afterwards but not much else beyond that point. The next day when I was hanging out with some of the same people, one of them mentioned how a friend might have free spyware blocker left their camera at the pho place.

Click Here

Available from eBay here . This is no ordinary N50 Pentel Pen Marker, this pen was 'liberated' by myself during a failed attempt to gain a place on Wieden and Kennedy's WKside scheme. This pen appears to have soaked up the creative energy flowing around the Wieden and Kennedy studio and, believe it or not, has the power to create award winning ad campaigns entirely on its own. I'm not entirely sure how it works, it may be something they put in the ink. I am, however, sure Wieden and Kennedy would like to keep the secret of their successes away from competitors almost as much as rivals would washington mutual like to get their grubby mits on this little creative Holy Grail. Therefore I am confident of making a pretty penny one way or another and it looks like my interview wasn't entirely fruitless. Happy bidding Elliott

jitter picture share

Note: this is a very long post, a meditation in draft form. I've revised it a little bit since I first posted it. I was sitting quietly the other day, reflecting on things to do with our faith, conversations I’ve had in recent days, as a Catholic, with Evangelical/Emergent Christians, thinking about the nature of authority in the Catholic Church and how different it is from authority in the Protestant world, when suddenly I heard a word, spoken very clearly in my mind: Acquiescence. Since coming into the Catholic world, I’ve read and thought a lot about the quality, or virtue, of obedience, and about its necessity as a virtue to develop if one hopes to grow in holiness: obedience to the Church on matters of the faith, trusting that the Church has been endowed by God with the charism of infallible interpretation of Scripture and all matters of the faith, through the office of the Pope and the Magisterium in union with the Pope. I have also been aware, both in the Protestant world and in the Catholic world, of much bickering about matters of the faith. At times, I’ve done my share of bickering, perhaps more than I should. As a Catholic, I’ve done my share of struggling with certain of the doctrines hard to understand, or challenging to really accept and live. I’ve struggled hustler magazine with aspects of church life in the Catholic world that are frustrating, or less than fulfilling.